Embrace the suckthe same dayThe titular phrase is well-known in the military, though this might be…
Dandelion or Elephant?
Growth and control biases2023When we don’t recognize that growth and control are in tension with…
Shadows and Curses2022It is often an uncomfortable job to be the one pointing out…
The discovery of the dandelion/elephant framing was exciting and my fellow FLUX colleagues and I engaged in a rather fun “hacky sack of ideas” game, tossing the framing back and forth and looking at it from this side and that. One pattern that emerged was the “dandelion/elephant” test: is this company/team/product/concept a dandelion or an elephant? The test kept producing unsatisfactory results, making us wonder: are we holding this wrong? As usual, some new insights emerged. I will try to capture them here.
r/K selection and innovation2022To set the stage, I am going to do a very brief…
First things first: it is very easy to get disoriented about what it is that we’re testing. In our excitement, we’d forgotten that the biological equivalents of our subjects are strategies. The r-selected strategy and the K-selected strategy are approaches to the problem space that various species take. Similarly, “dandelion” or “elephant” aren’t attributes or states of an organization or product. They are strategies that an entity chooses to overcome a challenge it faces. In other words, it’s not something that an entity is or has, but rather how it acts.
The law of tightening aperture2023What happens to the teams with wide apertures over time? Does the…
Since it deals with strategies, the dandelion/elephant lens is highly contextual. A whole company or an organization or even a product is not beholden to just one strategy. There can be multiple, complementary sets of strategies for the same product.
Growing dandelions2022A couple of weeks ago, I talked about r/K-selection and mentioned two…
If I am building a REPL environment, I am clearly exercising the dandelion strategy in relation to its customers. I want ideas my customers have to be easily copyable, discoverable, fast to first results, etc. See the Interest, Legibility, Velocity, Access conditions I outlined earlier.
No ship ums2023I’ve been thinking about the path that software dandelions take toward becoming…
Caring for elephants2022Now that we have a guiding compass for growing dandelions, what of…
However, when considering how to organize the development of this REPL environment itself (all the infrastructure and tooling that goes into creating a dandelion field for others), I am likely to take an elephant strategy. I would want capabilities that enable me to build upon my idea, not continue to reinvent it from scratch every few months. I will seek higher reliability, more features, rigorous processes, and increasingly more powerful capabilities – the outcome of the Stability, Breadth, Rigor, and Power conditions.
Model flattening2021If you know me, you were probably expecting me to inevitably stir…
Embodied Strategy2022I was having a great conversation with a colleague about organizational learning…
Just like with any strategy, these are subject to becoming embodied. This is why I keep harping on about conditions. Us choosing to employ a given strategy is not a simple decision. It is a matter of the environment in which this decision is made. It is our environment that enables us to choose a strategy – or prevents us from doing so.
Dandelion/Elephant Strategy Rubric2022For the environments where the shape is well-known, with no new space…
Here’s one way to think of it. Our strategy is an aggregate of the moves we individually make. If most of us are making dandelion moves (rapidly mutating ideas we discover, generating new ones without holding on to the old ones), we are in the dandelion environment. If instead, we seem to be making mostly elephant moves (collectively reinforcing one big idea, making it richer, more nuanced, more thorough, etc.), we are in the elephant environment.

In either case, no matter how hard our leaders may call on us to change a strategy from the one we’ve currently embraced, we will only be able to produce gnarly beasts: dandelions with elephant trunks, or elephants made of pappus.
Strategy Aperture2023The concept of embodied strategy continues to captivate me. Recently, I found…
Innovation frontier2023First, we need to know what our embodied strategy is. We need…
Being Strategic2022It all begins with intention. There’s something in our environment – the…
Nudging Embodied Strategy2022The whole concept of the cone of embodied strategy is a bit…
The contextual quality of the lens allows us to use it to spot inconsistencies of our intentions with our conditions. Once spotted, these inconsistencies can offer a lot of insight on what nudges to make to the cone of embodied strategy.
The nature of the challenge2021While working on a strategy this week, I realized that one of…
Why will this be hard for us?2021I was working on a strategy and helping review another this week,…
What the heck is strategy work?2022We turn the mastermind toward frameworks. The key objective of this role…
Convergent innovationnine days afterAs a sort of thought appetizer, here’s a vignette attempting to intersect…
Generating ideas and strategy coherencelinks here, 2022If we set out to do something that calls for an elephant…
This framing of strategy challenges feels more hopeful to me. Instead of looking for someone to blame, look for the conditions that are present and whether or not these conditions are mismatched with the intention. If there is a distinct mismatch, look for ways to change conditions to align better with the desired outcomes.
Show 1 comment
Generating ideas and strategy coherence – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · November 14, 2022
[…] we will have strategically incoherent outcomes (I called them the “pappus elephants” in the previous post). Our bottom-up culture will suddenly snag us like a trap, with coordination headwinds becoming […]