Practices to break out of the cycle of not-learningseven days beforeAt each step in the vicious cycle of not-learning, there is a…
Embodied Strategy
Organizational pathology2022I was reading the latest book by Richard Rumelt, The Crux, and…
I was having a great conversation with a colleague about organizational learning and at one point, I kind of just blurted out that strategies are embodied. Here’s my attempt to expand a bit on this idea.

Jankless2021As we Orient, examining our prediction error and updating our model of…
A strategy and a plan2021A colleague asked me this great question: “What’s the difference between a…
Put very simply, organizations usually have two strategies: one that is stated, and one that is embodied by the organization. The first one is typically highly visible, and the second is mostly invisible and only detectable by its effects. As I mentioned before, every organization has a strategy. Even if this strategy is not stated, the presence of outcomes and the patterns they follow indicates some sort of strategy at play. It might not be the same as the stated strategy. It could be a strategy that accelerates the team’s demise. It could be a strategy that favors short-term outcomes to the long-term ones. But there’s a strategy nevertheless.
Why do I find this seemingly nitpicky point so important? Because when we say in exasperation “this team/organization/unit can’t do strategy!”, what we’re actually saying is that we have given it our best, but failed to influence this team/organization/unit in attaining a state of executing on a strategy that is coherent with its stated intentions. What I am offering here is some light on where the source of such a failure may reside.
Continuously Integrated Strategy2022Somehow, these amazing ideas don’t seem to extend to strategy. In the…
If you ever met a human, you might notice that we are full of habits. Some of them are good for us. Some of them are not so much. Organizations are bunches of humans, so they follow the same pattern. We call some of these habits rules and processes, and others norms and culture – or maybe even mission-critical infrastructure. Organization’s embodied strategy emerges from the full collection of its habits. It is this embedded strategy that defines the range of the outcomes and behavior patterns that are within the organization’s reach.
Why will this be hard for us?2021I was working on a strategy and helping review another this week,…
As we all know from our own personal experiences, habits are hard to change, especially without putting in some intentional and patient effort. Some habits are so ingrained that they become part of our identity. This might add clarity to why sometimes, despite our best attempts to devise and instill a different strategy — no matter how elegant and sound — the outcomes remain the same. If our ideas fall outside of the organization’s range of embodied strategy, our efforts to realize them will be in vain. The habits will hold us tightly within that range.

A vision and a hallucination2022To be compelling, a vision must be posed as a solution. That…
To visualize what’s happening, imagine that there’s a vertical line on the horizontal scale of time, representing the range of what’s possible, constrained by the embodied strategy. Even if the range stays constant over time, the choices we make are path-dependent. So, from our vantage point of the present, the line will produce a cone-like shape when projected into the future. If our desired strategy plots a course outside of this cone, this strategy is unlikely to succeed. In such cases, the stated strategy becomes detached from the embodied strategy, resulting in loss of coherence.
It also becomes evident that if we are to influence what an organization does, we must begin with first understanding its embodied strategy and the range that it affords. We need to know the shape of the cone. Rather than throwing up our hands in frustration, we need to stop looking at the stated strategies, load up on patience and dig deep.
Steady winds, doldrums, and hurricanes2023It just so happened that this year, many of my friends and…
Since it’s all habits, the facets of the organization’s embodied strategy will be hiding in plain sight. They will not seem like the usual strategy artifacts we’d find in a shared folder. Embodied strategy is tacit knowledge, and not something that is cleanly captured in a slide deck or a spreadsheet. In fact, the less noticed the habit, the more likely it is part of the embodied strategy. In many cases, only newcomers or outsides can spot them. This is why I love chatting with folks who recently joined the team. They have the best chance of seeing what the rest of us have long stopped noticing.

Enumerating constraints2021From the bottom, we are supported — and limited — by our…
Strategy aperture gifts and curses2023Now that I’ve sketched out the concept of strategy aperture, let’s play…
There seems to be a fairly strong relationship between the age of the team and the shape of the cone. A newly-formed team will have an extremely wide-ended cone: there’s very little strategy that’s actually embodied. Nearly everything is possible. As the team grows and develops its collection of habits, the cone narrows. Mature teams are stuck with the needle-like cones: they graduate to what they’re supposed to do, and that’s the only thing they can do. The embodied strategy becomes a trap that doesn’t let them change.
The law of tightening aperture2023What happens to the teams with wide apertures over time? Does the…
Growth and control biases2023When we don’t recognize that growth and control are in tension with…
I hope you hear parallels with the Innovator’s Dilemma in this story. Aversion to risk and sticking with what works isn’t some simple thing that organizations can just choose not to do. When the next big opportunity manifests, no matter how strikingly, a mature organization can’t act on it because its embodied strategy, over time, shrunk the cone of possibilities into a laser-thin line. The negligible likelihood of this line intersecting with new opportunities is what foretells the organization’s future obsolescence.
Separating cargo from the train2023I’ve been puzzling over a problem that many engineering teams face and…
This shrinking happens naturally, as a result of the team encountering challenges and obstacles, finding ways to overcome them and committing these experiences into its memory. Some of these might be company lore. Some of these will be new gates in the launch process. Many will result in the broadly-adopted tools and frameworks being built. Each – though good and useful as a matter of progress – narrows the width of the cone bit by bit. This process is not something we can prevent from happening, and we’re better off realizing that it’s always at work.
Gravity and water2023I have been lucky enough to be part of the process of…
Especially for organizations that have been around for a while, we must understand that while we can change what the organization does, the manner in which this doing happens is rarely affected. For instance, following Clayton Christensen’s advice in The Innovator’s Solution, we might decide to form a distinct team that will pursue a strategy that puts us outside of the organization’s current cone of embodied strategy. However, if we’re not careful, this team will choose to rely on the larger organization’s well-established norms, practices, and processes. As a result, we might be surprised to find out that our attempts to reach our desired destination are thwarted by the same cone of embodied strategy that we wanted to break out of.
Generating ideas and strategy coherence2022Here’s the thing. In software engineering (as likely in many technology fields),…
The nature of the challenge2021While working on a strategy this week, I realized that one of…
Nudging Embodied Strategythe day after, links hereThe whole concept of the cone of embodied strategy is a bit…
Strategy and FOMOlinks here, 2022However, where things typically get sideways is when we, spurred by our…
A crutchlinks here, 2022It is not hard to infer from this description that pathologies have…
Dandelion or Elephant?links here, 2022Just like with any strategy, these are subject to becoming embodied. This…
Being Strategiclinks here, 2022We are swayed by our embodied strategy to choose approaches that are…
What the heck is strategy work?links here, 2022A clarifying insight for me was this: strategy is a team sport.…
Strategy Aperturelinks here, 2023The concept of embodied strategy continues to captivate me. Recently, I found…
Innovation frontierlinks here, 2023First, we need to know what our embodied strategy is. We need…
The rise of makerslinks here, 2023All these properties interact with each other, so they aren’t exactly orthogonal.…
It seems to me that every exercise in strategy must begin with the study of embodied strategy. The whole “know thyself” bit may sound cliche, but there’s a reason why both Roger Martin and Richard Rumelt emphasized “coherent actions” and “capabilities” as part of strategy work: they were pointing at the notion that our strategic aspirations are constrained by the cone of habits our organizations have accumulated.
Show 8 comments
Nudging Embodied Strategy – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · August 17, 2022
[…] whole concept of the cone of embodied strategy is a bit depressing, to be honest. What’s a mature organization to do? Curl up and cry? Surrender […]
Strategy and FOMO – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · August 25, 2022
[…] thinking. Instead, the urgency of the moment causes the organization to fall back onto its embodied strategy. The outcomes can still be favorable, but they will have more to do with luck and brawn, rather […]
A crutch – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · September 30, 2022
[…] uncomfortable for the organization. Almost by definition, crutches are part of an organization’s embodied strategy. While spotting one is a significant breakthrough in itself, it is rarely sufficient to cure the […]
Being Strategic – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · November 13, 2022
[…] are swayed by our embodied strategy to choose approaches that are familiar rather than the ones that are called for by our diagnosis, […]
Dandelion or Elephant? – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · November 14, 2022
[…] like with any strategy, these are subject to becoming embodied. This is why I keep harping on about conditions. Us choosing to employ a given strategy is not a […]
What the heck is strategy work? – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · November 19, 2022
[…] A clarifying insight for me was this: strategy is a team sport. One of the most common mistakes a strategist can make is to presume that they get to “make strategy”. They may produce a sleek artifact that looks like strategy. They may even get the leaders to enthusiastically co-sign it. However, unless this artifact describes what the already organization does, it isn’t the team’s strategy. As a team, we make decisions that influence our team’s future. Every decision we make adds up to the sum vector of where we end up going. We all do strategy work. The strategy we end up with is what emerges from our collective efforts: the embodied strategy. […]
Strategy Aperture – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · February 18, 2023
[…] concept of embodied strategy continues to captivate me. Recently, I found a more resonant way to talk about the narrowness and […]
Innovation frontier – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · April 12, 2023
[…] we need to know what our embodied strategy is. We need to understand what our capabilities are and where they will be taking us by […]