Dimitri Glazkov

The rewrite countthe same dayAs a software engineer, I often see a struggle that both teams…Questing, Scaling, Keeping

· 3 min read

Jankless2021As we Orient, examining our prediction error and updating our model of…The rewrite count2021As a software engineer, I often see a struggle that both teams…I’ve written a couple of takes on this before, but they didn’t feel quite right, so here’s another iteration. Keep that rewrite count ticking! It seems that there are some distinctions that I can draw when looking at the missions of teams, whether hidden or stated.

The first kind of mission is the one I call questing. This is the mission of discovery and pioneering. A questing mission usually involves going into the wilderness with a good chance of never being heard from again. Questing folk cheerfully accept this possibility, soaking up the thrill.

Dandelion/Elephant Strategy Rubric2022Everyone who wants to live in this niche must be engaged in…The second kind of mission is scaling. Here, the team is asked to make something go big. There’s usually already some momentum, some flywheel that’s in place, and the team needs to ride it and not fall off in the process. Scaling missions can feel a bit like catnip — strong feedback loops within the flywheel create clarity and sense of direction, making it a game of skill: challenging, yet ultimately predictable.

The law of tightening aperture2023What happens to the teams with wide apertures over time? Does the…The keeping kind of mission is all about preserving the value, to guard and to protect. There’s usually a treasure of some sort, and the team is asked to ensure that the treasure remains intact. Be that a key metric or some critical infrastructure, the keeping folk will make darn sure it stays the way it’s supposed to be.

Aircraft Carriers and Zodiac Boats2024An insightful conversation with a colleague inspired me to articulate the distinction…People-keeping and mission-keeping2021In a couple of conversations this week, this distinction between people management…Each of these missions has a different set of values. Questing missions value learning. You might fail, but you better live to tell us about what works and what doesn’t. Scaling missions value shipping. If it didn’t make the number go up, it didn’t happen. Keeping missions value predictability: “you can promise, but can you guarantee it?”

Organizational cartography2022Given that this team is thriving, the various units within it collaborate…Steady winds, doldrums, and hurricanes2023It just so happened that this year, many of my friends and…In a large organization, there are usually teams that contribute in different ways: some are questing, some are scaling, some are keeping. The mix of teams’ missions will reflect the overall mission of the organization. In a keeping organization, there will be fewer questing teams. In a questing organization, fewer keeping. The relationship between the mix and the overall mission seems bidirectional: just like a questing organization will discourage the emergence of keeping teams within it, it might have a hard time changing its mission given its current mix. For example, no matter how hard an organization wants to endeavor on the scaling mission, if most of its teams are questing, it will remain a questing org.

Separating cargo from the train2023I’ve been puzzling over a problem that many engineering teams face and…Vision-oriented and impact-oriented mindsets2022Impact-minded folks tend to fall into the trap of opportunism. When I…Spelunking our network of assumptionsthe same dayI’ve noticed that my ability to operate in an ambiguous, complex environment…Rock tumbler teamslinks here, 2021Rock tumbler teams start using the new stuff before it’s ready. They…Stages of the customer-vendor looplinks here, 2022Reflecting on a post from a year ago, this framing might be…Gravity and waterlinks here, 2023If I want to create a team that innovates daringly while situated…And that’s another twist to the story: team missions shift as they make progress — and these shifts rarely get the attention they deserve. If by some chance a questing team hits the motherlode, it will need to rapidly transform into a scaling team. These changes are often painful, and cause polarization. I once (it was a long time ago) had gotten rather frustrated with a lead on our team. We hit non-linear growth and desperately needed to optimize, to improve quality, performance, add features — and he wanted to pursue a whole new kind of idea! “I am more of a v1 type of guy,” he explained. I was miffed. Back then, I didn’t realize that folks have mission preferences. Just like team missions influence organizational mission, each of us will often have a preference for the mission, influencing capabilities of the team. As the team mission shifts, we are asked to grapple with the question whether this new mission matches our individual preferences. And when it doesn’t, we might be heading for another kind of crisis.

Show 2 comments
  1. Rock tumbler teams – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · July 30, 2021

    […] have some skin in the game: they aren’t just prototyping and building interesting demos. Their mission is a composite of questing and scaling: they are to both build something useful and to improve the […]

  2. Gravity and water – Dimitri Glazkov linked here · June 20, 2023

    […] for the fact that most processes around me are designed and incentives are structured for a “keeping” mission, none of that may matter. Implacably, my attempts to encourage innovation will come out […]