<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GWT And Now Script#: The Agony of a Thousand Puppies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glazkov.com/2006/05/23/agony-of-thousand-puppies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glazkov.com/2006/05/23/agony-of-thousand-puppies/</link>
	<description>Web and About</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Golik</title>
		<link>http://glazkov.com/2006/05/23/agony-of-thousand-puppies/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Golik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glazkov.com/blog/agony-of-thousand-puppies/#comment-90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely agree, you can&#039;t do a lot with such kinda of frameworks(GWT, script#). People that consider them as cure are without enough understanding of javascript itself. Furthermore, there are lot of benefits of using dynamic typed languages(ruby, php, smalltlalk .etc).
I&#039;m developer that use both dynamic and strong types languges and I have to say that somehow the flow of dynamic languages is much faster. Things are just done in more expressive manner and with less coding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree, you can&#8217;t do a lot with such kinda of frameworks(GWT, script#). People that consider them as cure are without enough understanding of javascript itself. Furthermore, there are lot of benefits of using dynamic typed languages(ruby, php, smalltlalk .etc).<br />
I&#8217;m developer that use both dynamic and strong types languges and I have to say that somehow the flow of dynamic languages is much faster. Things are just done in more expressive manner and with less coding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noah</title>
		<link>http://glazkov.com/2006/05/23/agony-of-thousand-puppies/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glazkov.com/blog/agony-of-thousand-puppies/#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to disagree with you on two things:
1) &quot;...Javascript is a fully-featured, widely used, and /beautiful language/...&quot; (emphasis mine)

The reason for this project is precisely because not everybody believes this.  By introducing variable types into Javascript (well, not really into JS but into C#) we can limit some of the issues we run into with loosely typed objects.  This is only one of many enhancements that C# provides over JS and why C# makes for a &quot;better&quot; coding experience and helps one build less buggy software.

2) ...&quot;because I get to experience firsthand what layers of abstraction do to code.&quot;

I have only one response for this: &quot;guns don&#039;t kill people, people kill people.&quot;  This is the IDE vs Notepad argument... Are there a lot of crappy programmers out there?  Sure?  Do IDEs make them bad?  No!  Yes, I learned to code in Notepad.  No, I don&#039;t want to do that on a daily basis.  The IDE makes my life a whole lot easier.  

ASP.NET introduced the great time saver that is ViewState, but &quot;with great power comes great responsibility&quot;.  To label abstraction evil instead of labeling teachers who only teach on the top level of abstraction bad is ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you on two things:<br />
1) &#8220;&#8230;Javascript is a fully-featured, widely used, and /beautiful language/&#8230;&#8221; (emphasis mine)</p>
<p>The reason for this project is precisely because not everybody believes this.  By introducing variable types into Javascript (well, not really into JS but into C#) we can limit some of the issues we run into with loosely typed objects.  This is only one of many enhancements that C# provides over JS and why C# makes for a &#8220;better&#8221; coding experience and helps one build less buggy software.</p>
<p>2) &#8230;&#8221;because I get to experience firsthand what layers of abstraction do to code.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have only one response for this: &#8220;guns don&#8217;t kill people, people kill people.&#8221;  This is the IDE vs Notepad argument&#8230; Are there a lot of crappy programmers out there?  Sure?  Do IDEs make them bad?  No!  Yes, I learned to code in Notepad.  No, I don&#8217;t want to do that on a daily basis.  The IDE makes my life a whole lot easier.  </p>
<p>ASP.NET introduced the great time saver that is ViewState, but &#8220;with great power comes great responsibility&#8221;.  To label abstraction evil instead of labeling teachers who only teach on the top level of abstraction bad is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

